The Biggest Threat to America today, next to mail-in fraud, is PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION based on identity blocking the vote! Election rigging.

MORE Election rigging! Former Minority Leader Susan Kent pushes gender quotas in all voting.
Minneapolis Chair Briana Rose Lee Briana Rose Lee and Vice Chair Mike Norton attempt to divide the Minnesota DFL

It's come to this.

Minority blocs including radical women, questionable black politicians like Keith Ellison, and those immigrants like Ilhan Omar who are highly critical of America and in some cases voice support for terrorist actions against us or our allies, have seized control of the U.S. House of Representatives. Combined with corrupt safe-seat districts for the DFL in the Twin Cities (CD4 and CD5), this has resulted in un-American attacks on our biggest city. Now the governor wants $500 million from FEMA to respond to this crisis.

They have not achieved this through open elections, but by reserving delegates for identity groups in the nomination process. At the core of the crises is this election rigging through quotas excluding the general population from freely participating to nominate candidates. These proportional representation laws are unconstitutional and need to be stopped immediately! As in Smith v. Allright in 1944 where the Texas Democrats excluded non-whites from their primary, today's Minnesota DFL excludes whites and males by placing a cap on their participation so they can't have an influence.

Today a majority of the delegates from every state, and down to the precinct level, have to be women. In addition there are required quotas for minority groups, ethnic groups, and homosexuals/lesbians. This is the group with which the Democrats will seek to lead the country.

Yes, it's come to this. If you want to participate to help your state and nation, rather than to ask what government can do for you, you can't.

You're only allowed proportional representation. But that is not how our Constitution works!

We're entitled to real representation based on a vigorous discussion of the issues. And that goes for the caucuses and conventions, primaries that national parties conduct. But they are blocking access to be a voting delegate in the endorsement process that really puts people on the ballot.

It is not working because of identity-based political decisions. No! We need to make the system work, not cut it to pieces!

My 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case against Democrat gender quotas restricting voting

"The practices Carlson challenges are internal DFL rules that govern party officers and endorsements, not public elections"....Fed. Judge Michael Davis, Democrat

In Minnesota endorsements by the Minnesota DFL is marred by distortion of voters quotas. A majority have to be women (they used to say proportional representation, but they definitely cap male delegates by law, not by discussion to 50%. On July 24th in this MNSecofState primary, Susan Kent of Texas, former Minority Leader tweeted:

"[T]he primary lesson is that women should always constitute >50% of any voting body."

So for white men who used to be very active, they can never hit 50% because they have to also be subjected to racial and religious quotas.

Therefore the hit of COVID19 by giving the party grounds to universalize mail-in ballots, other changes that weaken the integrity of the mail vote means that the predominant selection of the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate is the tainted caucus and convention process which has been determined by a federal court in Carlson v. Ritchie (I was the plaintiff) to be merely an internal straw poll, basically.

Here are some excerpts from the opinion of the federal court of Minnesota in my 2012 federal case challenging inter alia the unconstitutional gender-quota voting in the Minnesota DFL party selection process for the nominee.The court found,

"Both McCollum and Carlson appeared on the 2012 general election ballot because they won primary elections, not party caucuses."

"In Minnesota, a party’s endorsement is simply an expression of support by a private political association; it has no impact on the legal processes by which Minnesota chooses its elected officials." Of course Lori Swanson and Michael Davis are crazy. The Constitution DOES govern caucuses and conventions. And in fact the issue is whether the convention is an "integral part of the election machinery." It is NOT whether an election is private or public.

Having allowed the "privated association" of an organization that clearly makes decisions on behalf of the independent voters, Swanson and Davis continue, "The Minnesota Secretary of State is not responsible for a [DFL] political party’ s internal organization or the manner in which it chooses delegates..Nor do Defendants or the State do anything to “sanction[]” the “DFL party . . . policies and practices.”

That's a loit of mumbo jumbo. But the opinion does not say clearly that the SOS does not at all sanction the selection of the delegates. Or the manner. While the parties may "merely" file their rules and procedures with the SOS, it is the SOS who anou
In this case it was the SOS who announced that the normal requirements for the mail-in ballots will be waived because of Covid19.

The record of this case also included my arguments about Smith v. Allright where the State of Texas allowed by their democratic parties election rules an all-white primary. One that favored one race. White women were allowed to vote. There too the Demoratic Party claimed their little "internal exercise" did not decide the Senator. It was just a private association making an internal decision.

"Defendants have no legal authority to force a Minnesota political party to change its internal policies, and the DFL is not a party to this action. There is no allegation of any particular law, policy, or action by Defendants regarding the DFL’s procedures, apart from alleging that Defendants know about the quota system and have done nothing about it.

Although Carlson asserts that the DFL is legally required to be a “state-sponsored and regulated forum where partisan candidates for office can be selected to be put on the official ballot”...it is the voters in the primary election, not the political parties, who select the candidates to be placed on the general election ballot. Also, the candidates listed on the primary election ballot have been “selected” pursuant to procedures set forth in Minnesota Statute Chapter 204B, none of which require endorsement or other approval by a political party. "Political parties are private entities that possess the right to the freedom of association. See Tashjian v. Republican Party of Conn., 479 U.S. 208, 224 (1986) 14 (“[A political] [p]arty’s determination of the boundaries of its own association, .."Carlson v Ritchie 9/ "and of the structure which best allows it to pursue its political goals, is protected by the Constitution. And as is true of all expressions of First Amendment freedoms, the courts may not interfere on the ground that they view a particular expression"Carlson v. Ritchie 10/ " as unwise or irrational.”). “Freedom of association also encompasses a political party’s decisions about the identity of, and the process for electing, its leaders.” Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Cent. Comm., 489 U.S. 214, 229-30 (1989) "(citation omitted). Although Carlson is correct that, in some instances, constitutional protections will extend to party procedures, the required context does not exist here. As the Supreme Court explained in United States v. Classic, "Where the state law has made the primary an integral part of the procedure of choice, or where in fact the primary effectively controls the choice, the right of the elector to have his ballot counted at the primary, is likewise included in the Carlson "right protected by Article I, s 2. 313 U.S. 299, 318 (1941). Here, the party candidates for the general election for Congress are determined by the primary, which is run by the State, in which every voter has a right to vote, and in which there isCarlson v Ritchie 15/ "no allegation of a quota system. Carlson’s allegations solely relate to the DFL caucus and convention system, which does not determine which candidates appear on the general election ballot as candidates for Congress. "Carlson v Ritchie 16/ "Thus, his allegations fall under Eu in which the Supreme Court held that a political party’s right to “[f]reedom of association also encompasses a political party’s decisions about the identity of, and the process for electing, its leaders,” 489 U.S. at 229 Carlson v Ritchie 17/ "rather than under Classic. In sum, there is no allegation in the Amended Complaint regarding the DFL’s policies that can sustain a claim against Defendants, who have no part in the creation, execution, or enforcement of the DFL’s internal caucus policies.I quoted briefly from the federal court opinion in my case against the
@minnesotadfl The federal court in Carlson v. Ritchie 2012 excused the #genderquotas benefitting
@amyklobucharBecause the obviously rigged #MailInVoting system of
@MNSecofState
and
@MinnesotaDFL
does not provide a valid selection of the nominee, the selection stands on a bald-faced gender, race, and other special interest #voterquota system. The nomination process is fundamentally flawed

@bettymccollum04
and
@TinaSmithMN
ONLY because of the false claim that the caucus system is NOT the integral mechanism of the election that chooses the nominee. With #MailInVoting...
and
@MNSecofState
to show that the DFL admitted voter quotas to benefit my opinion
@TinaSmithMN

@amyklobuchar
and
@bettymccollum04
because of their gender. This violates the U.S. Constitution
I have just quoted my federal lawsuit against the
@MinnesotaDFL

@MNSecofState
in which they admitted they follow #genderquotas which exclude men from voting, beyond the "cap" imposed to protect a huge proportion of the delegates from being white men (or black men). Rigged.Replying to
@TrMosley

@TerryBrown71
and 4 others
My point is that you reach a certain point at which you seek to participate in the electoral process because you believe you can be heard to select representatives in Washington. But
@amyklobuchar

@TinaSmithMN
are there because they are white women, seats are protected for them.
Replying to
@TrMosley

@TerryBrown71
and 4 others
Voting doesn't matter because the national Democratic Party, the party of slavery (Republicans were founded in Wisconsin up here specifically to end slavery), selects who your "choices" will be to represent you, AND puts kabosh on debate leading up to that selection.
@TinaSmithMN

Interrogatories posed to OSS Legal Counsel Bert Black regarding Blocking claim and email claim

First set to Contestee Mark Ritchie, directed to Nancy Breem, Elections Office long-time worker (Blocking claim, Email claim)

First set - Blocking claim (Al, DFL, blocking access to Minnesota courts to enforce election rights)

Second set (not "first", video's mistaken) - Debates claim (Al, DFL, Mike McFadden, GOP blacking out Independence Party Nominee views by excluding him from all broadcast debates and even mention of his existence

Third set - Caucus claim (Al, DFL, OSS, Minnesota Legislature and courts blocking Steve Carlson, Independence Party Nominee from seeking support of Minnesota DFL voters)

Fourth set - Email claim (Al, DFL, OSS and courts blocking Steve Carlson, Independence Party Nominee from using public information emails to campaign to Minnesota voters)