You may not know the importance of the decision to remove women on the basis of age from their breast cancer treatment coverage

KEITH ELLISON LOSES abortion case, now tries to deny Minnesota Legislature the power to regulate abortion, in defiance of Dobbs decision

Smith, Klobuchar attack U.S. Supreme Court action to save women's lives

A recent outrageous legal failure by the current AG Keith Ellison relied on the 1995 case Minnesota v. Gomez to try to undo the clear mandate of the USSC in Dobbs June 24 saying there is no constitutional right to abortion. In doing so Keith drew attention to what I've been saying in the courts--that the MN Health Dept has been stealing money from other programs to fund abortion on demand. And now, of course, Ellison and Walz are ginning up a massive abortion industry to serve the entire country, and that will steal more Medical Assistance funds. It was protecting health care funds to help in childbirth, not death that was at the heart of the 1995 case.

Gomez ruled that "medical assistance and general assistance statutes that permitted use of public funds for childbirth-related medical services, but prohibited similar use of public funds for medical services related to therapeutic abortions, impermissibly infringed on a woman's fundamental right of privacy under the Minnesota Constitution." And, in 2016, Dayton's hand-picked assassin said also that breast cancer patients in a federal low-income treatment program also could not be protected from theft to pay professional abortionists.

Keith Ellison, Amy Klobuchar, Gov. Tim Walz all insist they lost the "right" to abortion. Only the legally ignorant can believe and I don't believe it. Those tough decisions remain to be made in our great state. I'll explain to this politicians what the Surpeme Court decided. For the record: In the Dobbs case the State of Mississippi was trying to save the lives of Mississippi women by requiring any abortions to be done before 15 weeks. But Keith Ellison, pretending to represent Minnesota, said, no they cannot. And Keith, just stop me if I'm wrong. But I'm not wrong. Science shows women who have an abortion between week 16-20 are thirty-five times more likely to die in that abortion than when they have it at week eight. Does anybody care about this, Keith? Do black lives matter? Does the truth matter, at all to you Keith or is it just all politics, working the machine?

Well, why couldn't the State of Mississippi take this step to save women's lives? We all know Ruth Ginsberg would have let these women die, but the issue is why? Merrick Garland would let them die, but why? Because there's another case involved in the "jurisprudence" of the Supreme Court since that 1973 Roe v. Wade decision was written by a Minnesotan, Harry Blackmunn. That second case is called Casey. And that case said since Roe establishes a "constitutional right" to an abortion (it didn't) that any attempt to regulate abortion at all is an "undue burden" on this "right" of "everywoman". And so, argued Keith and the gang, you can't attempt to save women's lives, because that is undue burden on the aboriton industry that elected Tina Smith (with the assurance of a women's entitlement, gender quota).

Since 2013 I have been helping my wonderful wife to fight for her life against breast cancer. Tina Smith's administration with Mark Dayton, were the opposition. What they did was repeatedly cut off her treatment coverage. To say that was a big deal for us, and for me, is to understate it. That time includes my time as a U.S. Senate nominee in 2014. The case just finished June 15, 2020 at the U.S. Supreme Court. I am continuing this fight against Smith in this U.S. Senate election.The same party that was establshed with the sole, and mighty purpose of abolishng slavery in America nearMinnesota, has now abolished the equally evil institution of throwaway abortion of the unborn.
@TinaSmithMN

@amyklobuchar

@MinnesotaDFL

we welcome the restoration to humanityRed, brown and yellow, black, tan and white, we've restored our humanity, we are precious in His sight. No longer will we look one race to another and say ah, you're the race that is denied the light, whose demise is celebrated without fanfare or fight.

Why is this important to you as a Minnesota voter in 2020 Senate race? Because Smith's party is working to have the government take over all your health care. That's right, they want to use your money and your insurance, to spread it around to people who 'need it more.' Well that's just what happened to us. And what has taken the lives of dozens of Minnesota women who lose their coverage in the middle of their treatment, including by being "aged out" by Keith Ellison and welfare departments. Dayton and Lori Swanson, and now Walz and Ellison, fight like the dickens to cover up the results of their clearly negligent and we believe unlawful practice of deciding to stop payments to your medical providers, on the basis of age. They reason "the most impoverished" need the cancer care dollars more than the aging patient, and they let local welfare departments give that money away, with no accountability to basically anyone they please!

This is very bad for your future health care, and Minnesotans need to reject this and need to reject Tina Smith on August 11. You can crossover into the DFL primary and vote Tina Smith out. I am running on that ballot, so are three additional candidates. Anyone but Tina Smith of Planned Parenthood. She used to plan to get rid of the unborn. Now she plans to get rid of aging women who through no fault of their own got cancer and offended Tina by continuing to live during treatment--by AGING in that treatment.

From her time as Mark Dayton Chief of Staff, has terminated the breast cancer treatment of women in the middle of their breast cancer treatment leaving them severely uninsured and requiring them to spend their income down to 80% of poverty to get a dime! Impossible. Tina Smith abuses federal law and illegally takes funds from cancer patients! Vote her out and stop this war on women! Thank you. On June 15, 2020 the U.S. Supreme Court shamefully threw Granny off the cliff.

Follow Up: After I tweeted this out to Smith and called for an answer, saying "You can run but you can't hide", Smith answered "I’m honored to have introduced this life-saving legislation. It’ll have a profound impact on families like Katherine’s.--referring to a woman named Katherine who tweeted support: "Thank you @TinaSmithMN for introducing into Senate HR7123 Katherine’s Lung Cancer Early Detection and Survival Act of 2020. We are so grateful for your support of future generations of families! #LCSM #katiewins" Butthis hasn't even made it out of committee, and is no excuse for Tina taking money intended for federal beneficiaries of an existing cancer program that is incomplete.